Jump to content

Political Discussion Thread (With Rules)


Simon

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Tom said:

The first stories I saw on CNN and BBC had to explain the origin of the phrase so I understood why I was supposed to be offended. 

 

When I was walking around Canada as a teen I had someone pass me by raising his fist, shaking it, and cheering 'rahowah!'  I cheerfully responded back.

 

It look me years later to understand he was chanting for a racial holy war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tom said:

The first stories I saw on CNN and BBC had to explain the origin of the phrase so I understood why I was supposed to be offended. 

 

There's the other consideration of course.  They were asking black people whether it was OK to be white.  At least some of them would take it in the really weird way.  Which is to say "It's OK for them, the black people to be "white"."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Cygnia said:

This could go in the coronavirus thread, but there's politics...blah blah blah, "just" Montana blah blah blah, longshot

 

Republicans Want to Ban People Vaccinated for COVID From Donating Blood

 

1st thought Please don't be Tennessee, please don't be Tennessee

 

Okay, not Tennessee (for once), but still painfully stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Dr.Device said:

I've got to say, it sucks that it's likely that by the end of this year I won't be able to drive across this country without fear of arrest, just for existing. 

 

I never cared much for the republican party, but I deeply hate it's current incarnation.

 

It's okay, they hated you first.

 

Also I'm pretty sure you already can't drive across the country.

 

I may have mentioned this before but my team recently hired a new analyst, a girl who literally had to flee Texas for California because she's trans.  Texas' loss and our gain, though I'm a little resentful that she's better at our job than I am.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cancer said:

 

The root problem here, tho, is extremely difficult to address:  the media partisanship, which isn't merely philosophical, it's become entrenched and, as the Fox election fraud story is showing, deliberately driven for profit.  The article calls out "simplistic caricatures"...which is an error both sides make.  But in the information overload age, it's hard to do anything else.

 

Getting different sides to talk is at least an important part of the solution...but it's VERY hard to do on a large scale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, unclevlad said:

Getting different sides to talk is at least an important part of the solution...but it's VERY hard to do on a large scale.

 

Particularly when the media makes money on the very opposite of that thing.  Literally eroding the country for cash... which is a thing we've seen in many other venues, this is just one more of them...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the dog in question is carrying a handgun without a FSC, and doesn’t have a reduced capacity magazine, that’s two law violations in CA. Now if the dog is not the legal owner of the firearm (likely some dogs do not have recognized property rights), the firearm owner might face charges around the safe storage of the firearm depending on whether there are children around.

 

 Later this year, the presence of the firearm is likely illegal if this is a public space (due to the impending “sensitive spaces” bill).

 

 So while California doesn’t have a required carry permit, fear not. We have plenty, PLENTY, of regulation in this area to cover it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Iuz the Evil said:

As the dog in question is carrying a handgun without a FSC, and doesn’t have a reduced capacity magazine, that’s two law violations in CA. Now if the dog is not the legal owner of the firearm (likely some dogs do not have recognized property rights), the firearm owner might face charges around the safe storage of the firearm depending on whether there are children around.

For the non-Americans, what is FSC ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, death tribble said:

For the non-Americans, what is FSC ?

Sorry, that’s California specific. Firearms Safety Certificate 

 

https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/firearms/forms/hscsg.pdf

 

 You require one of these to purchase a handgun, which the dog apparently did. Unless he/she/they acquired it through a lineal intrafamilial transfer from their parent, grandparent or child or inherited it? Either of those are registered with the Department of Justice.
 

Ammunition purchase is a separate thing. Just focusing on the dog carrying a handgun currently.

 

I also am unsure if that is an approved firearm from the California roster approved for sale. And you cannot see if it has a threaded barrel, which is a major crime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...